President Donald Trump’s effort to host peace talks between Russia and Ukraine should be recognized as a bold attempt at diplomacy. Instead, Hollywood celebrities have chosen to mock, attack, and spin bizarre conspiracy theories, revealing how deep Trump Derangement Syndrome still runs in left-wing circles.

Trump welcomed Russian and Ukrainian delegations to the White House this week in an effort to ease tensions and chart a possible end to the conflict that has destabilized Eastern Europe for years. Yet while ordinary Americans recognize that peace is worth pursuing, some of Hollywood’s most outspoken liberals immediately took to social media to tear down the president and his efforts.

Star Wars actor Mark Hamill, a longtime critic of Trump, resurrected one of the most infamous hoaxes of the last decade: the so-called “pee tape.” That discredited conspiracy theory, pushed during the Russiagate frenzy, claimed that Russian intelligence had compromising video of Trump. Despite being thoroughly debunked years ago, Hamill gleefully revived it, posting a smug reference to “kompromat collections” to his BluSky followers.

Actress Amber Tamblyn piled on, suggesting without evidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin “has something” on Trump. She insisted that whatever it is must be “something big,” once again pushing the tired narrative that Trump is secretly controlled by Moscow.

George Takei, known more these days for his political rants than his Star Trek fame, went further, declaring Trump a “weak ass president.” He claimed Trump would “concede at the table what Russia could not take on the battlefield,” suggesting the peace talks were a betrayal of Ukraine rather than a step toward stopping the bloodshed.

Pop icon Barbra Streisand weighed in as well, calling the meetings “embarrassing” and accusing Trump of weakening NATO. She argued he was damaging America’s alliances, ignoring the fact that Trump’s talks aimed to reduce the risk of wider war in Europe.

Meanwhile, Mia Farrow and rocker Jack White abandoned substance altogether, focusing instead on the décor of Trump’s White House. Farrow posted a photo mocking the “gold-tinged” room style, sneering that it was “tasteless kitsch.” White joined in, blasting the same design choices. Their fixation on furniture and wallpaper, rather than geopolitics, perfectly encapsulated Hollywood’s misplaced priorities.

This meltdown is nothing new. For years, Hollywood has been at the front lines of attacking Trump, clinging to conspiracy theories and amplifying misinformation rather than engaging in real policy debate. The resurfacing of the “pee tape” hoax, long since proven false, shows just how desperate these celebrities are to keep old narratives alive.

Trump, on the other hand, has framed his peace push as a chance to stop endless wars, protect American interests, and restore stability abroad. While critics on the Left scream about conspiracies, Trump is the one actually sitting down with global leaders in pursuit of results.

The contrast could not be sharper: A president working toward peace on one side, and on the other, a chorus of wealthy entertainers retreating into tantrums and recycled hoaxes. Their outrage doesn’t reflect mainstream America—it reflects a Hollywood bubble more interested in clicks and applause from like-minded activists than in the lives at stake overseas.

If anything, the celebrity backlash proves Trump has hit a nerve. By trying to end a war the Left has exploited for political leverage, he is once again exposing their hypocrisy. For Hollywood, that’s a threat they can’t stomach. And so, instead of supporting peace, they attack the man trying to deliver it.

Trump’s peace initiative may or may not produce immediate breakthroughs, but it has already revealed something important: when the choice is between tantrums in Beverly Hills and leadership in the White House, Americans can clearly see who is serious about the future.